utility monsters造句
例句與造句
- This would defeat the " happy " utility monster of average utility.
- It can be shown that all consequentialist systems based on maximizing a global function are subject to utility monsters.
- Thus, giving units to the utility monster fails to change the group's utility unless the utility monster has the least utility.
- Thus, giving units to the utility monster fails to change the group's utility unless the utility monster has the least utility.
- Nozick deems these exploiters'utility monsters'( and for ease of understanding, they might also be thought of as happiness hogs ).
- It's difficult to find utility monsters in a sentence. 用utility monsters造句挺難的
- According to Kuznicki, this proposed justification negatively affects society, because people's demand for equal payment for life's pain creates these Utility Monsters.
- People not part of the utility monster group ( or not the utility monster individual themselves ) are left with less happy units to be split among the members.
- People not part of the utility monster group ( or not the utility monster individual themselves ) are left with less happy units to be split among the members.
- The "'utility monster "'is a thought experiment in the study of ethics created by philosopher Robert Nozick in 1974 as a criticism of utilitarianism.
- Utility monsters state that the others are happier in the world to begin with, so they would not need those extra happy units to which they lay claim anyway.
- Even if the utility monster has the least utility, maximin would only prefer allocating units to the monster until it catches up with the member that has next-to-least utility.
- Nozick poses utility monsters justify their greediness with the notion that compared to others, they experience greater inequality or sadness in the world, and deserve more happy units to bridge this gap.
- The experiment contends that there is no way of aggregating utility which can circumvent the conclusion that all units should be given to a utility monster, because every different system has a monster and defeating one utility monster creates another.
- The experiment contends that there is no way of aggregating utility which can circumvent the conclusion that all units should be given to a utility monster, because every different system has a monster and defeating one utility monster creates another.
- This criticism is also exemplified by Nozick's utility monster, a hypothetical being with a greater ability to gain utility from resources, who takes all those resources from people in a fashion that is seen as completely immoral.